Village Autonomy: Elevating the Urban Vernacular in 21st Century Guangzhou

Incremental Cover.jpg
incremental7.jpg
Guangzhou_UrbanVillages.jpg
ekwong_ab_cl_02.jpg
04_Networks.jpg
incremental5.jpg
incremental4.jpg
market.jpg
ethnographic sketch-02 copy.jpg
Incremental-1.jpg

2017

Harvard Graduate School of Design

Urban Design Master’s Thesis
With Advisors, Anita Berrizbeitia and Christopher Lee

Urban Design Thesis Prize Nominee
Harvard University Asia Center Research Grant Recipient
2018 Bi-city Biennale of Urbanism\Architecture Participant

Guangzhou, China

The philosophy and know-how of the anonymous builders presents the largest untapped source of architectural inspiration for industrial man.
— Bernard Rudofsky

“Village Autonomy” unpacks the intricate layers that exist historically, socially, economically, and spatially in Shipai Village, a typical urban village in Guangzhou, China. The thesis maps a social geography that is built incrementally over time and sustained through an autonomy of kinship dynamics. Drawing on urban theory and highly specific local fieldwork, the nuanced reading of this collective form focuses on the evolution of the vernacular building types and their part-to-part relationships that respond to elements of interconnection in everyday life. Urban villages are in a constant transitory state, continuously regenerating by addition and revision of parts to form a truly evolving and open-ended collective entity.

For the past two decades, urban villages were under constant threat to be demolished and redeveloped with a top-down approach that implements a model in a coalition with developers, resulting with projects rooted only in financial rationale. However, recent momentum in China’s rural land reforms creates a new opportunity to empower and enable the village collective to self-develop, along with new regulations that lift their value from dead to transferable capital. The next stage in Guangzhou’s development must be to fully establish and sustain urban and rural land integration.

Seeking to transform existing vernacular order into contemporary urbanism, the designer asks if there is an alternative that can reconcile the static conventions of central planning for the formal city with the indeterminate open structure of the urban village. By calibrating today’s socioeconomic forces and facilitating the linkages of building types, the future framework will maintain village autonomy and integrate existing human relationships in a new commons that stimulates the active unfolding of city life.




 
Only when housing is determined by households and local institutions, can the variety of dwelling environments be achieved. Only then can supply and demand be properly matched and consequently satisfied.
— John Turner

The design project acknowledges the intrinsic relationship between housing and local economies that are main drivers of a balanced consumption and production cycle and in turn, a balanced domesticity. The design proposition is an outcome of a set of principles that facilitate the existing live/work relationships, allowing it to unfold and adapt with its transitioning context.

           

 
 
Incremental-2.jpg
 
 
incremental3.jpg
siteplan.jpg
ekwong_ab_cl_08.jpg

The design principles are influenced by Guangzhou’s past vernacular type – the classical courtyard house. The prototype extracts the spatial configuration of sequencing between open and closed spaces. By reviving the past type, the new vernacular will arise from specific typological parameters that will generate the qualities that suit the social context and climatic conditions of the region. In doing so, a set of metrics is applied to specific scenarios on the horizontal urban plane and vertical direction to meet the density pressure of the urban context. 

The fluctuation in the unit’s dimension is determined by the user themselves based on their social and environmental preferences. On the ground plane, negotiations between neighbors create deviations from the standard measurements resulting in small variations of the open pavilion.

 
 
 
incremental6.jpg

This thesis rethinks the notion of planning cities, towards an urbanism of integration that is capable of anticipating and hosting change over time. With a nuanced reading of these collective forms, attention to the space between things and part-to-part connection is more significant as an urban model than for individual buildings, avoiding rigid solutions in planning and architecture practices. Through a set of adaptive principles, like the model this thesis has demonstrated, we can design cities to respond and facilitate the constant forces that operate and transforms at unpredictable rates.

With this new mode of urban thinking, one can reevaluate urban policy and form to respond to the logics of daily life, where supporting networks of relations between neighbors, and facilitating flows of labor and goods, are more effective tools against the forces of social and economic marginalization and spatial fragmentation.